Data added in the Database in January, February and April 2007
This page informs on the progress made in the inclusion of new data in the database.
Data added in 2007:
August, October and November |
May - July |
January - April
Data added in 2006:
October - December |
July - September |
April - June |
January - March
2007 April 29
All data were kindly prepared and provided by JCM.
Data from Arentoft T. et al. 2007, Astron. Astrophys. 465, 965
(2007A&A...465..965A).
2007 April 24
All data were kindly prepared and provided by JCM.
Data from Kang Y.B., et al. 2007, Publ. Astron. Soc. Pacific 119, 239 (2007PASP..119..239K)
Data from Anthony-Twarog B.J., et al. 2006, Astron. J. 131, 461 (2006AJ....131..461A)
Data from Groenewegen M.A.T. et al. 2007, Astron. Astrophys. 463, 574
(2007A&A...463..574G).
Notes: As the RVs are given with respect to the systemic velocities, a value
of 5.4 was added to put them on an absolut system.
2007 April 22
There is a modified layout of the individual cluster pages online.
I downloaded DSS Images regarding to the central coordinates and
diameters included in WEBDA. The minimum and maximum diameters for
the images are
10 and 45 arcminutes, respectively. The charts were all converted
to .png format of 353x354 Pixels of 152 Kbyte size. This should give
you an impression about the quality of the coordinates and the cluster
itself. Charts for clusters without any observations are
underway. Any comments and/or critism are very much appreciated.
2007 April 21
Data from Kim S.C., et al. 2005, J. Korean Astron. Soc. 38, 429
(2005JKAS...38..429K).
Notes: Only data within two times the given cluster diameter (600 Pixels) were included. New cluster in the database.
Data from Kim S.C., et al. 2005, J. Korean Astron. Soc. 38, 429
(2005JKAS...38..429K).
Notes: Only data within two times the given cluster diameter (1050 Pixels) were included. New cluster in the database.
2007 April 12
More information for clusters without any observations are now
displayed, e.g. Berkeley 26.
Thanks to Matthias Kronberger for the feedback.
2007 April 07
Data from Carraro & Costa 2007, Astron. Astrophys. 464, 573
(2007A&A...464..573C).
Notes: Only data within four arcminutes around the cluster center were included.
Data from Carraro & Costa 2007, Astron. Astrophys. 464, 573
(2007A&A...464..573C).
Data from Carraro & Costa 2007, Astron. Astrophys. 464, 573
(2007A&A...464..573C).
Data from Carraro & Costa 2007, Astron. Astrophys. 464, 573
(2007A&A...464..573C).
Data from Carraro & Costa 2007, Astron. Astrophys. 464, 573
(2007A&A...464..573C).
- Cluster parameters,
- Cross-reference table: column 1 added,
- VIc CCD photometry,
- X,Y positions.
Notes: Only data within three arcminutes around the cluster center were included. New cluster in the database.
2007 April 01
Data from Messina S. 2001, Astron. Astrophys. 371, 1024
(2001A&A...371.1024M) kindly prepared and provided by JCM.
Data from Zwintz & Weiss 2006, Astron. Astrophys. 457, 237
(2006A&A...457..237Z).
Data from Messina S. 2001, Astron. Astrophys. 371, 1024
(2001A&A...371.1024M) kindly prepared and provided by JCM.
Data from Zwintz & Weiss 2006, Astron. Astrophys. 457, 237
(2006A&A...457..237Z).
2007 February 17
Data from Sujatha S., et al. 2006, Bull. Astr. Soc. India 34, 357
(2006BASI...34..357S).
Notes: New cluster in the database.
2007 February 14
Data from Ramsay & Pollaco 1992, Astron. Astrophys. Suppl. Series 94, 73
(1992A&AS...94...73R) kindly prepared and provided by JCM.
2007 February 10
Data from De Becker M., et al. 2006, Astron. Astrophys. 456, 1121
(2006A&A...456.1121D).
2007 February 04
Data from Jeffries & James 1999, ApJ 511, 218
(1999ApJ...511..218J) kindly prepared and provided by JCM.
2007 January 31
Data from Paunzen E., et al. 2007, Astron. Astrophys. 462, 157
(2007A&A...462..157P).
2007 January 29
Data from Guarcello M.G., et al. 2007, Astron. Astrophys. 462, 245
(2007A&A...462..245G).
Notes: Only stars with available V magnitude were included.
2007 January 23
I completely revised the data for this cluster. There were
several inconstencies which are now solved.
2007 January 21
Data from Baumgardt H., et al. 2000, Astron. Astrophys. Suppl. 146, 251
(2000A&AS..146..251B).
2007 January 11
Data from Ford A., et al. 2005, MNRAS 364, 272
(2005MNRAS.364..272F) kindly prepared and provided by JCM.
2007 January 05
Data from Mamajek E.E. 2006, Astron. Journal 132, 2198 (2006AJ....132.2198M).
Notes: New cluster in the database.
2007 January 04
All data were kindly provided by Brian Skiff.
- Coordinates J2000: IC 1848, IC 4996, NGC 129, NGC 581, NGC 654, NGC 663, NGC 744, NGC 1027, NGC 1245, NGC 1342, NGC 1444, NGC 1502, NGC 1545, NGC 1647, NGC 1664, NGC 1778, NGC 1893, NGC 1907, NGC 1912, NGC 2129, NGC 2168, NGC 2169, NGC 2287, NGC 2301, NGC2323, NGC 2353, NGC 2422, NGC 6475, NGC 6494, NGC 6531, NGC 6611, NGC 6694, NGC 6709, NGC 6802, NGC 6823, NGC 6830, NGC 6834, NGC 6910, NGC 6940, NGC 7031, NGC 7063, NGC 7067, NGC 7086, NGC 7128, NGC 7235, NGC 7261, NGC 7380, NGC 7510, NGC 7654, Trumpler 2 and Trumpler 35.
- More precise cluster coordinates.
I disentangled the two often confused clusters NGC 6996/7. Here
is the information according to Brian Skiff.
William Herschel's position for what he called VIII 58 (and assigned
NGC 6997 in the original NGC) was published as part of a large catalogue in
Phil Trans 76, 212 (1789).
Looking at DSS2-blue cutouts with SkyView with a coordinate grid overlain
suggests an accurate center is: 20 56 40 +44 38.5 (J2000), with some slop of
a few tenths of an arcminute only. Since this is within an arcminute of
Herschel's 1789 position, the identity is unambiguous.
Thus all papers referring to NGC 6996 actually are dealing with NGC 6997,
the modest (probably real) open cluster superposed on the western side of the
North America Nebula.
NGC 6996 was listed first by John Herschel, and its position from the
original NGC precesses to: 20 56 25 +45 28.2 (J2000), some 50' north of
NGC 6997. A look at the DSS shows a scattered group of moderately-bright
stars about 7' across ---not an open cluster--- at this location, which fits the
visual description. Again, there is no ambiguity about the identification.
So although this is legitimate NGC object, it is not of any astrophysical
interest.
epaunzen@physics.muni.cz
Last Update: 2007 April 29