SCYON Abstract

Received on September 7 2012

Modes of clustered star formation

AuthorsS. Pfalzner (1), T. Kaczmarek (1), C. Olczak (2,3,4)
Affiliation(1) Max-Planck-Institut fuer Radioastronomie, Auf dem Huegel 69, 53121 Bonn, Germany
(2) Astronomisches Rechen-Institut (ARI), Zentrum fuer Astronomie Universitaet Heidelberg, Moenchhofstrasse 12-14, 69120 Heidelberg, Germany
(3) Max-Planck-Institut fuer Astronomie (MPIA), Koenigstuhl 17, 69117 Heidelberg, Germany
(4) National Astronomical Observatories of China, Chinese Academy of Sciences (NAOC/CAS), 20A Datun Lu, Chaoyang District, Beijing 100012, China
Accepted byAstronomy & Astrophysics
Contactspfalzner@mpifr.de
URL
Links

Abstract

The recent realization that most stars form in clusters, immediately raises the question of whether star and planet formation are influenced by the cluster environment. The stellar density in the most prevalent clusters is the key factor here. Whether dominant modes of clustered star formation exist is a fundamental question. Using near-neighbour searches in young clusters, Bressert and collaborators claim this not to be the case. They conclude that - at least in the solar neighbourhood - star formation is continuous from isolated to densely clustered environments and that the environment plays a minor role in star and planet formation. We investigate under which conditions near-neighbour searches in young clusters can distinguish between different modes of clustered star formation. Model star clusters with different memberships and density distributions are set up and near-neighbour searches are performed. We investigate the influence of the combination of different cluster modes, observational biases, and types of diagnostic on the results. We find that the specific cluster density profile, the relative sample sizes, the limitations of the observation and the choice of diagnostic method decide whether modelled modes of clustered star formation are detected by near-neighbour searches. For density distributions that are centrally concentrated but span a wide density range (for example, King profiles), separate cluster modes are only detectable under ideal conditions (sample selection, completeness) if the mean density of the individual clusters differs by at least a factor of approx. 65. Introducing a central cut-off can lead to an underestimate of the mean density by more than a factor of ten especially in high density regions. Similarly, the environmental effect on star and planet formation is underestimated for half of the population in dense systems. Local surface-density distributions are a very useful tool for single cluster analyses, but only for high-resolution data. However, in a simultaneous analysis of a sample of cluster environments effects of superposition suppress characteristic features very efficiently and thus promotes erroneous conclusions. While multiple peaks in the distribution of the local surface density in star forming regions imply the existence of different modes of star formation, the converse conclusion is impossible. Equally, a smooth distribution is no proof of continuous star formation, because such a shape can easily hide modes of clustered star formation.